Marci For WorldMark


2008 ELECTION RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 

The official results of the 2008 election were announced November 21 on the WorldMark the Club website.  As expected, the two incumbents were re-elected.  (Remember that no challenger has EVER defeated an incumbent in a WorldMark election.*)

But the results are far from disappointing.  First, we succeeded in defeating Proposition 1, which would have given the Board of Directors absolute authority over whether, when, and how to expand the Board, as well as authority to appoint the new members.  Second, though the "total vote" showed me a distant third, there is more to the numbers than what WorldMark presents.

This is how the official results on the Director vote were published: (Click here to see the actual BNYMellon tabulation report)

CandidateOwner VoteBoD ProxiesOwner ProxiesTotal Vote
Henley51,40465,0800116,484
Herrick46,11365,0620111,175
Hunter9,401009,401
Charles11,7130011,713
Lee4,190004,190
Larson7,762007,762
Tribe33,127013,49846,625
Gring2,915002,915

However, just like in 2007, what they call "Owner Vote" includes the Developer vote.  The developer had 28,020 votes this year -- and they could vote those once for each available seat.  It is logical to assume that the Developer voted the same way the Board did. That is clearly what happened with the Proposition 1 vote, which was reported both with and without the Developer.  So that means that the "Owner Vote" numbers reported for each incumbent included 28,020 Developer votes.

If we could remove the Developer Vote and the Developer-Controlled Board Proxies from the total, the results would look like this:

CandidateNon-Dev Owner VoteOwner ProxiesTotal Owner Vote
Tribe33,12713,49846,625
Henley23,384023,384
Herrick18,093018,903
Charles11,713011,713
Hunter9,40109,401
Larson7,76207,762
Lee4,19004,190
Gring2,91502,915

I received more owner votes than the two incumbents COMBINED!  (I consider my "owner proxies" to be owner votes because these proxies were assigned to independent owners with the explicit understanding that they would be voted to support independent owner representation on the Board of Directors.  The Board's proxy solicitations said only "help us to achieve a quorum", with no disclosure that those "quorum-building" proxies would be used to maintain the Developer's control of the Board of Directors.)  Yes, the incumbents won the election -- but I clearly won the VOTE.

The results of this election, and the power that the Board's 65,000 proxies gave them, re-emphasize the need for an INDEPENDENT proxy drive.  For more on Proxies, click here.


*Exception:  In 2005, John Walker defeated Rhonda Harris.  But this was because the Board arranged it.  In the December 2005 Board meeting, they voted to cast none of the their proxies for Rhonda, and "for the non-incumbent candidate having the greatest popular vote in a sufficient number to ensure his election to the Board of Directors" (Minutes of 12/15/05 Board Meeting, item #16).



Back to Important Issues
Back to Home Page
Make a Free Website with Yola.